Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Class of One
I've been meaning to post for weeks now, but the confluence of launching Tutorpedia Southland (we now have tutors in Los Angeles, Long Beach, and Orange County) and getting the Tutorpedia Foundation off the ground has put my blogging on the back-burner. Through all of this travel and work, in countless meetings, lunches, and coffees, I have continued to laud what makes Tutorpedia different, how our programs can have a disruptive force on education: By giving students a "Class of 1."
How do kids learn with 30 students in a class? Or 20? Even the small classes that benefit most private schools rarely get below 15. So you have two dozen students (or twice that in public schools) in a room, all learning at different paces, all learning in different styles, all learning with different levels of awareness, ability, and aptitude. How is a teacher - even the most skilled, trained, and patient - to reach every child? There is just no way. And that's why we need a Class of 1: Personalized tutoring brings a Class of 1 to every student.
How is this scalable, you may wonder, with 6 million students in California alone? Well, first of all, not every student needs his or her tutoring subsidized (ie. many parents can, and do, pay top-dollar for 1-1 tutoring). So let's say that 50% of parents can afford the roughly $100/hour that most competitive tutoring companies or individuals charge. That leaves us with 3 million students who can't pay out-of-pocket. If we then focus on the lowest-performing 10% say, that's 300,000 students whose personalized education could and should be paid for by outside resources. In our calculations (at just under $30/hour, including program and administrative costs), we can provide 35 hours of 1-1 tutoring to an underserved student for $1000/year. To bring a Class of 1 to the most underserved students in the state, that would cost about $300 million. True, this a lot of money, but considering that Arne Duncan's Race To The Top fund provides more than $4 billion to innovate initiatives in education, that's a drop in the bucket (less than 8%), and California schools are a great place to start.
Let's use these same calculations with the San Francisco Bay Area, home to about 1 million K-12 students. If 50% can afford tutoring, that's 500,000 students who can't, so providing for the lowest-performing 10%, that's 50,000 students who would benefit most from 1-1 tutoring. At $1000 per student per year, that's investing $50 million in our future. The numbers are roughly the same for Los Angeles Unified School District.
What's the alternative? Increased Achievement Gap, more high school drop-outs, more students without a college degree. That's more undereducated students on the streets, and statistics show more youth in jail and prison. The cost of our prison industrial complex will soon exceed that of our education system. According to an article in the San Francisco Chronicle, "by the 2012-2013 fiscal year, $15.4 billion will be spent on incarcerating Californians, as compared with $15.3 billion spent on educating them."
So why all these numbers and dollar amounts? Because the answer to fixing our broken education system is not that complicated after all. Yes we need better pay, better training, and better professional development for teachers. Yes we need more computers and adaptive technology for our students. But what we need most of all is more personal attention. We need to build trust, confidence, and relationships. Research shows that academic tutoring improves social interactions, classroom attention, and positive teacher attention. In order to close the Achievement Gap, graduate more students from high school, and prepare them for college, a more personalized model is needed. Another research article shows that students engaging in 1-1 tutoring show significant gains versus those engaged in conventional (30-1) teaching models. And this study shows the improvement of academic performance and attitudes of students receiving tutoring. There are countless other studies and research done on 1-1 tutoring, and it all points in the same direction: improved academic and social performance.
We all grew up with The 3 R's: Reading, 'Riting, and 'Rithmatic. Now we need to focus on the New 3 R's: We need to make education more Real, Relevant, and Rigorous. And all of these foci need to be built on personal Relationships. The best relationships are formed in a Class of 1.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
This is a great post!
The only question that it raises in my mind is why things have become this way. Many of our critics from an older generation will say, “I never had a tutor and I excelled in school, went to a great college, and became a successful and productive citizen.” This is an admirable achievement, but just because someone did not have a tutor does not mean that they did not receive personalized academic attention. Where did many people from previous generations get at least some academic support, if not the same service an outside tutor would provide? Their parents.
I am probably one of the last few who was lucky enough to have an intelligent, college educated mother, who did not have to work to support the family so was able to help me with my education. I had basically the same abilities brought be a tutor at my disposal at any time during my life, and this was a resource I utilized heavily. Even my father got in on the act. From the age of 3 being drilled on addition and subtraction in the mornings to getting editing help on my college papers, my parents always had the time to help me with my education. I’d like to think I would have gone to the same great college, won all the academic awards, and ended up in the same good career without anyone else help, but the truth of the matter is without my parents help I have little doubt that I wouldn’t have climbed as high.
The landscape of family has been in a process of change for a while and it certainly impacts education. The norm is that both parents work and likely do not have the time or energy to go over school work with their kids. Even more so, as family time has been reduced it’s reasonable that families would rather just be together than have to worry about the next day’s homework assignment. The goal here is not to make a judgment call on this trend but simply to point it out.
The issue becomes more apparent for those families unable to afford tutoring. It is even more likely that both parents will work and probably longer hours. Additionally, there are plenty of single parents who are straddled with all of the responsibility. It is the children of these families that often most desperately need help from tutors but are least equipped to access it. For many reasons mentioned by the OP, we need to step in and make tutoring available to these students. While ultimately each person is responsible for themselves, every child that drops out or fails out due to inadequate educational assistance is not only a personal failure but an example of society failing as whole. Let’s strive together for six million classes of one in California.
These are some very good and tricky points to navigate. Tutoring most definitely is not a replacement for parenting. But that being said, the influence of caring adult for one or two hours every week on a young person's life has incredible potential benefits.
Schools are often called upon to solve social ills much larger than education. This is especially true in low-income communities - schools become the last great social service for students and their families. These schools are usually underresourced, and unable to keep up with even the most basic request and needs of the communities that they serve.
The Class Of One idea is a great way for schools to reconceptualize how they can best serve their students and communities. A little individual attention from a competent, caring adult goes a long way.
Post a Comment