On June 18th, we welcomed Education
Pioneers Graduate School Fellow Caitlin Fitzpatrick to the
Tutorpedia Foundation team as our Data and Impact Management Consultant.
Caitlin has been working with us this summer to help us better track our impact
on the students we work with and improve our ability to serve the Tutorpedia
Foundation community.
Caitlin
brings a wealth of knowledge to this project from her experience working as a
corps member for Teach For America, a program manager for Teach For China, and
a consultant for Ashoka Arab World. Caitlin's work ethic, analytical skills,
and perspective have been invaluable to Tutorpedia Foundation thus far.
Education Pioneers is a talent pipeline that exists to identify, train,
connect, and inspire a new generation of leaders dedicated to transforming the education sector. At least one year of graduate school is required, and Education
Pioneers recruits from a wide variety of disciplines including business, social
work, education, law, and policy.
We asked Caitlin to tell
us more about what brought her to Tutorpedia and Education Pioneers. Read on to learn more about her story and perspective.
Interest in Education Sector
My degree is in International
Economic and Political Development and through my graduate program at Columbia
University’s School of International and Public Affairs, I had the opportunity
to evaluate Nike-funded sports for girls empowerment programs in the Middle
East. One program, Al Tanweer, a league
of girls’ soccer teams and public schools in rural Egypt, was particularly
successful in improving girls’ confidence and discipline and in sparking change
in how the community viewed girls’ abilities relative to boys. The success of this program hinged largely on
its use of the public school infrastructure.
This project sparked an
interest in the education sector, and I went on to teach elementary school in
the Bay Area through Teach for America.
Since each Education Pioneer’s background and specialization is unique,
it has been a very rich learning experience to participate in discussions on
different topics in education throughout the summer at weekly workshops hosted
by Education Pioneers. Having worked
within the Teach for All network for the past 4 years, first with Teach for
America and then with Teach for China, many
of my assumptions about best practices in education have been challenged by
alternative perspectives and theories of change.
Tutorpedia Foundation’s Data and Impact Project
When I joined Education
Pioneers, I was particularly interested in working on a project involving impact
evaluation. I was interested in the project with Tutorpedia because this data
project is seeking to do just that, identify observable outcomes of successful
tutoring. Grades are one piece of the
puzzle, but good grades are a means to
greater opportunity and fulfillment in life—not an end in themselves.
Working with Teach for China
During my first year with
Teach for China, I worked on a taskforce of staff and teachers to design Teach
for China’s intended impact, our metrics for determining success. Our taskforce devised ways to capture
academic improvement, critical thinking, and culture of achievement through
exams, surveys and observations. There
was much debate about what we mean by more abstract concepts like critical
thinking and culture of achievement and how to place an objective measure on
these things. Even academic achievement
is not entirely black and white because these measures are only as good as the
tests upon which they are based.
The Systemic Challenge
Measuring impact in education is difficult because a quality
education equips a student with more than just content knowledge, but also with
other outcomes of education such as critical thinking skills, mindsets, and
character traits are difficult to capture in a quantitative goal statement. However, while it may be
impossible for entities in the education sector to craft the “perfect measure”
of these more abstract effects of education, it is still important to set goals
in these areas and evaluate progress against them because goals drive
action.
A major criticism of national test-based education policies is
that they focus solely on one measure of education quality (i.e., content knowledge) and that the pressure to perform on
this single measure is causing teachers to neglect efforts to develop students
in other ways. On the other hand,
observable outcomes are necessary for accountability, so it is critical that
education leaders develop and refine ways to quantify education outcomes beyond
academic test scores.
Future steps
I look forward to sharing
more of my thoughts at the end of the summer after the conclusion of this data
and impact project. Moving forward with
my work in impact evaluation in the education sector, I would like to consider
and develop ways that evaluation systems can efficiently capture and analyze
non-numeric information about program outcomes.
No comments:
Post a Comment